| Surveys bring decision-oriented
information into the public policy-making process. Surveys also provide
an excellent way of checking the pulse of the community and getting specific
and current information from a cross-section of residents in a timely manner.
This circular addresses the need for information on designing and implementing
surveys at the community level and from the perspective of the community. |
How you plan to use the information gathered
should inform the decisions you make in designing, conducting, and analyzing
the survey, as well as presenting its findings. Some possible objectives
of your survey might be to inform local policymakers, provide community
education on certain issues or programs, or enhance citizen participation
in the policy-making process by:
gathering
information on residents' attitudes and opinions
measuring
behaviors and population characteristics
soliciting
community reactions to policy proposals or solutions
having
residents assess the effectiveness of programs, facilities, and services
informing
people about new or planned public services
making
residents more aware of community problems and their effects
providing
residents access to the public policy-making process
providing an opportunity for communities
to influence public decisions
In local government or in your community,
an important outcome of conducting a survey might be increased commitment
to the survey process, findings, and subsequent recommendations. By bringing
citizens into the public decision-making process in the early stages, commitment
to the results of the process-and the psychological satisfaction of participating
in public decision making in a new and different way-can be obtained. For
example, one result of recent planning surveys conducted in communities
across Washington State was increased citizen excitement with the planning
process.
Below we present a framework for organizing
a survey and some factors to consider during its design and implementation.
Specific applications to face-to-face, telephone, mail, and drop-off and
pick-up survey methods are discussed. We wish to stress that conducting
a survey is technical at all stages. Persons using the survey interview
technique to gather information for the first time should consult an expert
to assist in developing the survey design, writing questions, and planning
the most appropriate implementation strategies (Table 1). Experienced local
government officials, community group members, and local Cooperative Extension
agents can design and implement community surveys if commitment to the
survey process exists and time is taken to ensure the quality of the process.
Quality assurance again may require consulting with an experienced surveyor.
TABLE 1.
Places to Find Survey Technical Assistance
Community College or University Political
Science, Sociology,
or Rural Sociology Departments
|
Washington State Partnership for Rural Improvement
(Spokane, Yakima Valley, and Skagit Valley Community Colleges)
|
County Planning Departments/Commissions
|
County Cooperative Extension Offices
|
Regional Council of Governments
|
State Department of Community Development
|
Private Survey Consultants
|
WHY DO A SURVEY?
Surveys are used to collect information
about a population. Usually, questions are asked to a subset or sample
of the community's population and the responses generate either numeric
(quantitative) or written (qualitative) information about the topics under
examination. Quantitative and qualitative information are usually requested
in the same survey, providing support and context for understanding the
survey's findings. Quantitative information comes in numbers and answers
questions like how many, how much, or to what extent. Qualitative information
comes in written words where the respondent expresses his or her thoughts
on a particular subject. Both types of information need to be interpreted,
and the resources for interpretation are different (see Step 5: Analysis
of Data).
The process of conducting a survey starts
with asking, and more importantly, answering yes to the following questions:
The answers to these fundamental questions
will help you avoid some of the pitfalls often encountered when doing a
survey. They also will help you decide whether a survey is appropriate.
Oftentimes, when reviewing these questions you will conclude that a data
collection method other than the survey might better meet your specific
information needs. Perhaps you can't identify specific questions-a little
library work and several informal conversations could provide alternatives
to doing a survey. If time is short, a survey is not a practical way to
obtain information. The answers to these questions also might lead you
to conclude that a survey should be combined with one or more additional
data collection methods to gain insight into the topic(s) being investigated.
We advocate using a multiple method strategy for gathering information
( Michael Butler and Howell 1980). The greater depth of insight provided
when combining survey data with other types of data, such as already compiled
reports, can enrich subsequent programming or policy development.
Surveys are one of several ways of collecting
information about your community. There is a lot of already published information
about your community that is available if you know how to look for it,
ranging from census data collected by the national government to special
reports compiled by local economic development agencies, utility companies,
and even school and hospital districts (Table 2). In addition, if it isn't
important to know how the majority of community members feel about an issue,
perhaps selecting a limited number of "knowledgeable" persons
for a focus group interview can provide the information you desire (Michael
Butler and DePhelps 1994; Patton 1990).
TABLE 2.
Where to Find Published Information
About Your Community
Public, Community College, and University
Libraries
|
County Cooperative Extension Office
|
Local Historical Society
|
City Hall
|
Chamber of Commerce
|
Local Government Offices
|
SURVEY FUNDAMENTALS
The six steps presented below provide
an outline for using surveys in your community. Because of the volume and
technical nature of information available, we only provide an overview
of the survey process. Each step may require technical expertise to ensure
that your survey does not "break down." Each step is critical
to the successful completion of the survey and none should be overlooked.
There are many books available through your local library (public, community
college, or university) that provide detailed information about survey
research; several good sources are provided in the references at the end
of this circular. Your county Cooperative Extension agent, local planner,
or planning agency may also be useful resources in helping you find out
what type of technical assistance is available in your community. For the
discussion below, please keep in mind that the purpose of your survey should
determine your design choices.
Step 1: Selecting the Sample
Sampling refers to the process of selecting
a subset of persons who are representative of the community population
so that you can capture the variety of behaviors, attitudes, or beliefs
of the community without having to include everyone directly in the survey.
Sampling is one of the most important and frequently misunderstood aspects
of doing a survey. Sampling can be a very technical endeavor. Because sampling
is so important to the survey process, it is discussed here in some detail.
In the end, remember that the purpose of your survey should determine your
sampling strategy.
When selecting your sample, you might
decide that rather than individual persons, you're interested in surveying
households or other community institutions. A key question for you to ask
is: Do you have a list of all of the possible people who you need to get
information from? Many community lists are available from local government
offices, utility companies, school districts, or voter precincts.
Selecting your survey sample can take
one of two forms-convenience or random assignment. Convenience samples
are selected without regard to the community's population. You might decide
to survey the people who cross Main Street and First during the lunch hour
on Wednesday, or the people who come out of the local grocery store on
Thursday afternoon, because those are the best times for you (and your
survey budget doesn't permit mailed surveys). Or, you believe that all
business people feel the same way about skateboarding on sidewalks downtown
and so you only survey members of the Rotary (a purposive sample). In neither
case are you worried about whether your sample, and therefore your survey,
is representative of the community or community subgroup, e.g., business
people.
Random assignment, on the other hand,
refers to a technical selection process in which each person in the community
(in technical terms, the population) has the same (or a known) opportunity
to be selected as a survey respondent. In a survey of the general population
(a survey not targeted at specific subgroups of the community, such as
women residents, residents over age 60, residents of certain neighborhoods,
etc.), you would like your sample to accurately reflect your community.
Accuracy is important because it permits you to generalize from your sample
to the entire community. This is because through random assignment, your
sample, and therefore your survey's findings, are representative of the
whole community.
The size of the sample depends on how
accurate your results need to be, and on your budget. Survey professionals
will tell you that you can buy better accuracy; in general, however, there
are certain minimum limits that should be observed. Samples of fewer than
30 persons are generally too small to be useful; experienced surveyors
tend to regard 100 or so as the minimum sample size when the population
is large. At the other end, the maximum practical size of surveys tends
to be around 1,000. In general, your sample can be smaller if the population
is relatively homogeneous (similar), only rough estimates of what the community
thinks or feels are needed, there are few major commitments to be based
on the survey information, and your budget and/or time constraints provide
additional limits on your survey. If differences are important, the attitudes
of several subsets of the population are relevant, and the potential consequences
of using the survey in public decision making are costly, selecting your
sample becomes critical to the success of your survey.
For example, single adults, families,
and senior citizens are each, as a group, likely to have very different
perspectives regarding the need to have after-school activities available
to school-age children. If the purpose of your survey is to find out what
your community members think about after-school programs, you need to include
enough single adults, families, and senior citizens to be accurate. If
you are not concerned about community subgroups, a sample size of 100 is
fine! If you need to be more accurate in terms of special groups (single
adults, families, senior citizens), your sampling strategy becomes more
complex. One common contingency is stratification, determining which characteristics
of the population (i.e., which subgroups) are key to your survey and then
dividing the survey population into such groups or strata. Random selection
would then proceed within each of the strata. Stratification and other
sampling methods are discussed in greater detail by Dillman (1978) and
Fowler (1988).
Step 2: Wording the Questions
The first activity in writing a question
is to identify the types of information needed. There are basically four
different types of information that can be collected using a survey. First,
there is information about attitudes, or what people say they want. For
example, you may need to know the extent to which local residents favor
the use of specific methods of collecting recyclable materials in your
community. Attitude questions could be used to learn whether residents
are "for" or "against" recycling different materials.
Second, information can be collected about the beliefs of people. For example,
do residents think that recycling household waste will improve the environment.
This is information about what people think is true. A third type of information
is about the behavior of people, for example, the frequency which residents
place recyclable materials at the collection center. Fourth, information
can be collected about the attributes of people, or what they are. Some
common attributes collected in surveys are the respondent's gender, age,
and status as a homeowner or renter. Using the four kinds of information
in supportive ways can provide a great deal of insight about the population
being surveyed.
There are four types of question structure
that can be used when writing a survey: (1) open-ended, (2) close-ended
with ordered response categories, (3) close-ended with unordered response
categories, and, (4) partially close-ended (Figure 1) (Dillman 1978). Each
question structure has a specific purpose.
FIGURE 1.
Examples of Survey Question Structure
Open-Ended What should be done in
order to improve access to East City Park?
|
Close-Ended With Ordered Response
Categories How often do you visit East City Park?
ONCE A WEEK OR MORE
TWO OR THREE TIMES A MONTH
ABOUT ONCE A MONTH
LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH
|
Close-Ended With Unordered Response
Categories Which city park do you visit most frequently?
NORTH CITY PARK
EAST CITY PARK
SOUTH CITY PARK
WEST CITY PARK
|
Partially Close-Ended Which of the following areas of
East City Park is easiest to access?
PICNIC TABLE AREA
DUCK POND
AMPHITHEATER
OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
|
Open-ended questions have no answer choices provided. Instead, respondents
are asked to answer the question in their own words. Besides allowing respondents
to express themselves freely, this type of question can be used to elicit
precise information.
Close-ended questions with ordered
response categories provide
a gradation of responses for a single concept. For example, the gradation
might range from strongly agree to strongly disagree. They tend to be specific
and restrict respondents thinking to a very narrow aspect of an issue or
situation in a limited way.
Close-ended questions with unordered
response categories ask for
information about alternate choices, such as the location of a community
swimming pool. These questions do not limit the respondents response to
gradations of a single concept.
Partially close-ended questions are used when there are many possible responses
but the survey is only addressing a few of them, such as the use of specific
community services-tennis courts, basketball courts, and specific programs
at the recreation center. By asking the respondent "Are there any
other services that you use?" you can avoid listing all of the possible
services that are available in the community or forcing respondents into
categories that they do not fit. Often, questions of this type simply contain
an "Other ..................." category.
Asking questions also requires technical
knowledge. Vague terms in questions or response categories, the use of
double negatives, assuming too much knowledge, writing cryptic questions,
and the use of broad categories to overcome objections are only a few potential
problems often found in survey questions. A short list of bad and better
questions is provided in Figure 2. A general rule of thumb is to keep your
questions and response categories short and simple.
FIGURE 2.
Bad and Better Questions
(Adapted from Fowler, 1988)
Bad
What do you like best about this community
(we're interested in anything like the houses, the people, the parks, or
whatever)?
What are some things about this community
that you like best?
|
Better
I am going to ask you to rate different
features of your community. Please think carefully about your response.
How would you rate (FEATURE)?
1 VERY GOOD
2 GOOD
3 FAIR
4 POOR
What feature of this community do you
like the most?
1 CITY PARKS
2 SHOPPING CENTERS
3 PUBLIC SCHOOLS
4 OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
....................................................
What three things do you like most about
living in this community?
1
2
3
|
Step 3: Constructing the Questionnaire
Getting responses to questions requires
that the questionnaire be presented in a way that entices the respondent
to fill out the survey. Would you feel like answering your questionnaire?
Poor copying (off-centered or blurry pages), dark paper making the type
hard to read, or not identifying the survey's sponsor can damage the credibility
of your survey. The expression "the medium is the message" is
true in the construction of your survey questionnaire (e.g., its size,
shape, and appearance), especially if it is being given to the respondent
without the interviewer administering it such as with a mail survey.
Just as important as being visually pleasing,
is where different types of questions appear in the questionnaire. Frequently
we find questionnaires beginning with requests for demographic information
(age, marital status, and so on). These types of questions, being rather
personal, belong at the end of the questionnaire and should be preceded
with a justification statement. For example, "Finally, we would like
to obtain some additional information to help with the statistical analysis."
If the respondent is told that the purpose of the survey is assessing residents'
needs for specific community services, questions about services should
be at the beginning of the questionnaire. The more controversial the questions,
such as how to pay for the services needed, can be raised after the respondent
has made the effort to answer the initial questions. Discovering "irrelevant"
or controversial and possibly offensive questions at the beginning of the
questionnaire may lead the respondent to discard it.
FIGURE 3.
Survey Checklist
use booklet form (long sheets
of paper folded once in the middle, printed on both sides on white or off-white
paper)
the front page is a cover page (title,
your logo, directions for responding, name and address of the sponsor)
the back page is "clean" (it
offers little more than an invitation for comments)
the first question pulls in the respondent
(e.g., easily understood, interesting, applicable to everyone, neutral)
questions are in some order (descending
importance based on your purpose-in this case respondent attributes such
as age, occupation, level of education, etc., are last)
the questionnaire layout should be consistent
(e.g., all close-ended responses to the right of the question)
the questionnaire should be "conversational"
(similar questions grouped together, transitional statements like "Next
we would like you to assesS the quality of services currently available"
are used, there is a flow between sections, objectionable questions are
positioned after less objectionable ones)
the questionnaire should be pre-tested
before it is administered
|
The checklist in Figure 3, based on research
conducted to enhance survey response rates for mailed surveys, is useful
to consider when drafting your survey questionnaire. Whether you mail your
survey or administer it face-to-face, a "clean" document is easiest
to answer.
Figure 4 provides an example of a well-designed
questionnaire.
FIGURE 4.
ADVISORY QUESTIONNAIRE
We recognize that, prior to this distribution,
citizens have received very little specific information concerning the entire
concept of annexation and consolidation in the Grand Coulee Dam Area. However,
in order to obtain some feedback for the committee working on this proposal,
please respond to the following questionnaire by November 13,1993.
Which statement best describes your initial
reaction to the concept of consolidating cities and unincorporated areas
in this region into one city.
Please answer one of the following:
I live within the corporate limits of one
of the four cities:
I live within an unincorporated area in:
What specific questions would you like
answered and what additional information would you like supplied in order
to help formulate your opinion concerning this issue? Please indicate in
the space below any specific questions you would like answered and any additional
information you would like supplied. Use additional sheets if necessary.
.....................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................
(over) |
Step 4: Implementing the Survey
An important decision that needs to be
made is how to conduct your survey. Four survey interview approaches are
available: (1) face-to-face, (2) telephone, (3) mail, or (4) drop-off and
pick-up. Your decision as to which method to use depends upon the purpose
and timeline of your research, the distance of respondents, and the resources
available (e.g., some methods cost more, some are more labor intensive).
Each approach has benefits and drawbacks, some of which are listed below.
Face-to-face interviews provide in-depth,
person-to-person exchanges. This is the most useful method when your respondents
are close by and not likely to respond to other approaches (perhaps they
are unable to read or have no telephone), but it is also the most costly.
Volunteers can be used to conduct the survey, but extensive training and
monitoring are needed to maintain consistency and quality in the interviews.
Telephone interviews permit the benefits
of face-to-face interviewing at a lower cost, and when conducted from a
single location, permit the monitoring of multiple interviewers. The disadvantages
to telephone interviewing include sampling limitations (e.g., some households
don't have telephones), intrusiveness of this method (some people will
not respond over the telephone), questionnaire constraints (you cannot
use visual aids), and appropriateness of sensitive questions.
For mail questionnaires, the chief advantages
are relatively low costs, minimal staff and facilities are needed for conducting
the survey, access to widely dispersed samples is provided, and respondents
can complete the survey at their convenience. Disadvantages include difficulty
in gaining the cooperation of some groups, the interviewer is not involved
in data collection, and you need to have good mailing addresses for the
sample.
Drop-off and pick-up questionnaires have
the advantage of reaching all respondents and allowing time for questionnaire
completion. Disadvantages include the interviewer not being involved in
data collection and requiring volunteers to help drop and retrieve the
questionnaires (in smaller communities collection sites can be predetermined
and noted to respondents).
Step 5: Analysis of the Data
Once you have received responses to your
survey, you need to make some order out of the many, possibly diverse statements
(qualitative data) or numbers (quantitative data) gathered. Data analysis
refers to the set of technical (statistical) procedures that help summarize
attitudes and activities and make comparisons among them relatively simple.
Personal computers and user-friendly statistical software packages provide
many opportunities to analyze community data with a bit of technical assistance.
Data analysis generally has one of three purposes-to describe the data
you have collected, to explore new questions about relationships among
the issues surveyed, or to find evidence that helps explain any patterns
found in the data. The type of data analysis that you do should match the
purpose of your survey.
One note of caution: it is unlikely that
everyone will complete your survey regardless of the approach you use.
As a result, nonresponses (and nonresponse rates) must be a part of your
analysis. A general rule of thumb for dealing with nonresponses is never
assume that the people who did not respond are just like the people who
did respond. A major source of error in survey findings comes from not
dealing with nonresponse rates and assumptions made about people who didn't
respond. This is another area where technical assistance can be helpful.
Step 6: Presenting the Findings
Presentation requires understanding your
audience, both in terms of what they value and how well-informed they are
regarding the topics of your survey. Some of the potential audiences for
your survey findings are:
- elected officials (municipal, county,
state)
- government agencies, program managers,
and staff
- advisory boards and committees
- community groups (PTAs, church groups,
homeowners associations)
- local business groups
- the media
The key to effective presentation is separating
the findings from the methodology. Some useful reporting formats include:
technical reports, memoranda, news releases, presentations at public meetings
or staff workshops, and videotapes. The use of charts, diagrams, or other
visual aids is suggested regardless of reporting format. Fowler (1988)
is a good source for information about data presentations.
SUMMARY
Surveys can provide useful information
to enlighten policy-making and program development and evaluation. Surveys
also provide an important means for public involvement in community decision
making and educating people about issues and services available.
Conducting a survey is a technical endeavor
and often requires assistance from people who are familiar with survey
fundamentals such as sampling procedures and questionnaire design. Communities
may want to team with university-based researchers to design their surveys.
County Cooperative Extension agents are a good source of information and
an excellent connection to survey researchers in land grant universities.
It is important to be clear as to the
purpose of the survey and to develop well-stated questions that people
can answer. Carefully thinking through the use of the findings when designing
a survey is also important. Lastly, using appropriate means of communicating
with different audiences and users of the findings is critical to assure
that the investment in data collection has been worthwhile. Achieving success
in the survey process is based upon carefully executing each step ranging
from deciding about how to meet your information needs to presenting the
survey findings.
REFERENCES
Dillman, Don A. 1978. Mail and Telephone
Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley.
Fowler, Floyd J., Jr. 1988. Survey
Research Methods (Rev. Ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.
Michael Butler, Lorna and Colette DePhelps.
1994. Focus Groups: A Tool for Understanding Community Perceptions and
Experiences. Community Ventures: Partnerships in Education and Research
Series, WREP 0128. Pullman, WA: Washington State University.
Michael Butler, Lorna and Robert E. Howell.
1980. Community Needs Assessment Techniques. Coping With Growth Series,
WREP 44. Corvallis, OR: Western Rural Development Center, Oregon State
University.
Patton, Michael Quinn. 1990. Qualitative
Evaluation and Research Methods. Second Edition. Newbury Park: Sage
Publications, Inc.
Community Ventures: Partnerships
in Education and Research Circular Series Topics
Community Surveys
Sondeo or Rapid Reconnaissance
Delphi Technique
Focus Group Interview Technique
Volunteers as Partners in Community Action
Techniques for Successful Public Involvement
Diverse Partners in Planning
and Decision Making
Using Case Studies
Organizing for On-Farm
Research and Education
Interest-Based Participation
Through Negotiation
Role of Government Agencies
in Public Decision Making
Citizen Advisory Systems
Community Ventures Series Coordinators:
Lorna Michael Butler
Colette DePhelps
Kelsey Gray
Community Ventures Manuscript Reviewers
Don Dillman
John Tarnai
Peter Hildebrand
Charlotte Garrido
Donna Randall
Don Orlich
Lisa McIntyre
Nancy Liggett
Nancy Sanders
Jim Long
Nancy Rausch
Kay Haaland
Judy Patterson
Larry Dickerson
Ellen Murphy
Margaret Ray
Mary Ellen O'Keeffe
Jim Barron
Annabel Cook
Janet Poley
Baird Miller |
Dan McGrath
Nancy Matheson
Bill Potapchuck
Ron Faas
Nick Lovrich
Tom Hoffman
Joan LeMiewz
Jack Watson
Pat BoyEs
Pricilla Salant
Dan Groves
Renee Overath
Donna Brians
Nancy McDuff
Rudy Johnson
Ray McNeilan
Jan Powell
Van Bobbitt
Robert O. Butler
Maria-Madrigal Ross
Mary Struother |
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work acts of May 8 and June
30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Harry
B. Burcalow, Washington State University; Other western State Extension
directors include: Hollis Hall, University of Alaska; James A. Christenson,
University of Arizona; Kenneth R. Farrell, University of California; Milan
A. Rewerts, Colorado State University; Noel P. Kefford, University of Hawaii;
Leroy D. Luft, University of Idaho; Andrea L. Pagenkopf, Montana State University;
Bernard M. Jones, University of Nevada/Reno; Jerry Schickedanz, New Mexico
State University; Lyla Houglum, Oregon State University ; Robert Gilliland,
Utah State University; Jim DeBree, University of Wyoming.
Extension invites participation in its
programs and offers them to all people without discrimination.
WREP0132 March
1995 $1.00 
TOP
|